FEDERAL PUBLIC NOTICE
UPDATE - Public Notice Comment period extended to July 4, 2018. Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United States as described below and shown on the attached drawings. The proposed project is located in the Lahaina Small Boat Harbor and Pacific Ocean at 20.871932°, -156.678821°, TMKs (2) 4-6-001:002, 003, and 014 at 675 Wharf Street, Lahaina, Island of Maui, Hawaii. The project description is as follows, to be conducted in accordance with the project plans: The installation of a new ferry pier in the Lahaina Small Boat Harbor.
Mr. Edward Underwood
Sand Island Access Road
Honolulu, Hawaii 96819
WATERWAY AND LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK: The proposed project is
located in the Lahaina Small Boat Harbor and Pacific Ocean at 20.871932°, -156.678821°,
TMKs (2) 4-6-001:002, 003, and 014 at 675 Wharf Street, Lahaina, Island of Maui, Hawaii.
PROPOSED PROJECT AND PURPOSE:
The project description is as follows, to be conducted in accordance with the project plans:
The installation of a new ferry pier in the Lahaina Small Boat Harbor. The ferry pier
would be located seaward of the existing U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) lighthouse adjacent
to the Lahaina Small Boat Harbor and approximately 70 feet north of the existing public
pier. The USCG has given the applicant permission to use the area adjacent to the
lighthouse on the condition that, before work can start on the ferry pier itself, the
applicant must repair of the foundation on and landward of the existing seawall beneath
the lighthouse. Repairs to the seawall next to the foundation of the lighthouse would
require the demolition of the existing 162 square foot catwalk pier. Following the
demolition, impermeable geotextile fabric would be temporarily installed against seawall
from top to ocean substrate, secured with untreated plywood on the seaward side of the
geotextile fabric, all temporarily held in place with concrete tapcon screws and steel
stakes driven into the rock substrate landward of the seawall. Once the temporary
geotextile fabric along the seawall is in place, the voids beneath the lighthouse
foundation would be filled with concrete via tremie method inserted by means of holes
drilled through the lighthouse foundation in uplands landward of the seawall.
Once the lighthouse foundations repairs are complete, structural Best Management
Practices (BMPs) for the rest of the project will be put in place, including turbidity
curtains, oil booms, and a 60-foot wide by 150-foot long spud barge. Turbidity curtains
would be placed around the active part of the project area and oil booms placed around
any working vessels. Both turbidity curtains and oils booms would be installed using
skiffs. The turbidity curtain would extend from the water surface to the harbor bottom
with a ½-inch chain along the ground surface wrapped in flexible reinforced
thermoplastic material. The barge’s eighteen 12-inch diameter H-pile spuds would be
temporarily embedded in the ocean floor using a backhoe or excavator on the barge. The H-pile spuds would be driven via hydraulic pressure from the weight of barge to
approximately two feet below the two to five-foot deep sand layer into hard substrate.
As the barge moves around the project site for construction of the ferry pier, the H-pile
spuds would be pulled out at each of the barge’s temporary locations prior to the
movement of the barge to the next temporary location. After the barge is installed, the
surface of the existing 162 square foot catwalk within the project area adjacent to the
lighthouse would be demolished and removed.
Following the temporary installation of the spud barge, construction of another
BMP, a trestle platform, would start with the temporary installation of 20 ¾-inch thick 24”
diameter steel hollow falsework pipe piles via drilling method using the pipe itself. Any
slag generated would fall within the steel casing and would be removed and disposed of
in an approved upland location. Following the installation of the trestle’s pipe pilings, the
six pilings remaining after the removal of the former catwalk would be cut using a
pneumatic rock drill, saw, or equivalent equipment to make the tops even with the water
surface to Mean Sea Level Zero. The cut portions of the pilings would be disposed of in
an approved upland location. After the trestle’s pipe piles are installed, the 5,650 square
foot steel beam and untreated plywood L-shaped trestle platform would be temporarily
installed in and around the perimeter of the footprint of the permanent ferry pier and its
gangways for construction access.
Construction of the permanent ferry pier would start with the installation of the
permanent pilings by auger-drilling sixteen ¾-inch thick 30-inch diameter shafts, placing
steel rebar cages within the shafts, and pouring tremie concrete into the shafts to
elevation 0.58 feet above the Mean Lower Low Water line. All spoils including slag and
displaced water from the drill shafts would be collected and pumped to a water-tight
Baker steel tank, transported to Mala Wharf until the material is dry, and then
transported to an approved landfill. The pilings would be installed from the land-ward
end of the gangway out to the ocean end of the pier. Following installation of the pilings,
the rest of the pier and gangway would be constructed from the ocean end of the pier in
toward the land. The pier would consist of 3.5-foot long by 5-foot wide precast concrete
tubs with reinforcing steel within precast member walls. The tubs would be filled with
cast-in-place concrete, connected by 4-inch thick precast planks and interspersed with
five 10-foot 2-inch wide by 6-foot long fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) grates. Excluding
the grates, the rest of the pier would be topped with an 8-inch cast-in-place concrete
slab. The 15-foot wide by 35-foot long lower concrete half of the gangway would be
constructed on top of four of the sixteen total pilings using the same materials and
methods as the pier. A 3-inch diameter waterline, ¾-inch diameter waterline, 3-inch
diameter sewerline, and electrical conduits would be installed in the pre-cast concrete
tubs of the pier and concrete half of the gangway prior to pouring cast-in-place concrete
into the tubs. The 15-foot wide by 35-foot long upper aluminum half of the gangway
between the concrete gangway and the shoreline would be installed with the waterlines,
sewerline, and electrical conduits fully enclosed within a utility raceway as part of the
A 14-foot tall one-story trellis shade structure would be installed above the surface
of the pier and other vessel utilities, such as a pump-out unit, hose bibs, and lighting
would be installed on the pier. Work in the adjacent uplands would include the
replacement of the Administration Building and construction of new concrete pavement
and bollards. The new 3,350 square foot ferry pier and gangway, excluding the 365
square foot area of FRP grates, would be 2,823 square feet larger than the existing 162
square foot catwalk.
The proposed work would be constructed using the BMPs listed in the BMP Plan
dated May 2017. Upland work related to the proposed work includes the use of a 0.5
acre area southwest of the intersection of Front Street and Ala Moana Street for
temporary stockpiling of materials and a 0.48-acre area for concrete washout,
construction trailer, and contractor staging areas. Staging areas would be stabilized with
grass following the completion of the proposed work.
Avoidance and Minimization: The applicant considered five on-site alternatives,
including the selected alternative and the no action alternative, in the Alternatives
Analysis portion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Under the selected
alternative, the footprint of the pier would be at least 1,235 square feet smaller and the
trellis design would be approximately seven feet shorter and allow more sunlight
penetration than the other alternatives. Unlike the other alternatives considered, the
selected alternative would not require dredging. Relative to the other action alternatives,
the selected alternative would avoid the removal a portion of reef flat and the full
removal of the existing piles of the former catwalk. The applicant further minimized
impacts from the original plan to impact-drive the pier piles by proposing to drill pile
holes and then either set pre-cast piles in place or drill the pier piles in and then allow
the piles to be cast in-place. The applicant would also include Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to minimize impacts, including using grated decking in the gangway to
allow for sunlight penetration, using full-depth silt curtains to capture turbidity, and
cleaning all equipment prior to in-water use.
Mitigation: The proposed project would not result in the loss of a water of the U.S. and
the project permanent impacts would not be substantial; therefore, the Corps is not
requiring compensatory mitigation for the project.
Basic Project Purpose: To improve inter-island travel
Overall Project Purpose: to provide improved ferry service between Lanai and Maui.
AUTHORITY: A Department of the Army permit is required pursuant to:
X Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) - To perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) - Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. The Corps’ public interest review will consider the guidelines set forth under Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230).
Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413) - Transport dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. The Corps’ public interest review will consider the criteria established under authority of Section 102(a) of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (40 CFR Parts 220 to 229), as appropriate.
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: The proposed action will not result in a discharge of dredged or fill material into a water of the U.S. and will not require authorization from
the Corps in accordance to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA). Under
Section 401 of the CWA (Public Law 95-217), the Corps may not issue a permit for the
described work until the applicant obtains a certification, or waiver of certification, from
the State of Hawaii, Department of Health – Clean Water Branch.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT CERTIFICATION: The proposed activity may affect land or water uses in the Coastal Zone. Under Section 307(c)(3) of the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended by 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3), the
Corps may not issue a permit for the described work until the applicant obtains a
Federal Consistency Concurrence from the State of Hawaii, Department of Business,
Economic Development, and Tourism – Office of Planning.
HISTORIC PROPERTIES: The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) identified five historic resources within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE): Kamehameha I’s Brick House, Hauola Stone, Pioneer Inn, historic seawall, and
historic lighthouse, all located within the Lahaina Historic District No. 1, which is also a
National Historic Landmark. Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA), the FTA determined that the project would have no adverse
effect on historic properties listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or
potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including
previously unidentified properties. The State of Hawaii, Department of Land & Natural
Resources, Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) concurred with this determination in a
letter dated August 24, 2016.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: Pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA), federal agencies must consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) and/or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on any action that may affect a
species listed (or proposed for listing) under the ESA as threatened or endangered or
any designated critical habitat. Based on the project location, the following protected
species have the potential to occur near the project location:
Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas), Threatened
Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Endangered
Hawaiian Monk Seal, (Monachus schauinslandi), Endangered
The FTA determined that the proposed activity may affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect an endangered or threatened species or its critical habitat. The FTA initiated
consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844) with
the National Marine Fisheries Service Protected Resources Division (NMFS-PRD).
NMFS-PRD issued a letter of concurrence dated February 16, 2018 stating agreement
with FTA’s ESA determination.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The FTA evaluated the proposed work for possible effects
to Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) pursuant to The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries
Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-267), which requires all Federal agencies to consult with
the National Marine Fisheries Service on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted,
funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat.
The Honolulu District includes areas of EFH as Fishery Management Plans. We have
reviewed the January 20, 1999, Western Pacific Fishery Management Council’s
Environmental Assessment to locate EFH area as identified by NMFS. The FTA
determined that the proposed project will have an adverse effect on EFH and initiated
consultation with NMFS-Habitat Conservation Division (NMFS-HCD). NMFS-HCD
provided EFH Conservation Recommendations in a transmittal dated January 31, 2018
and FTA agreed to comply with the EFH Conservation Recommendations.
FEDERAL EVALUATION OF APPLICATION: The decision whether to issue a permit
will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of
the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national
concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which
reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal
will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are
conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands,
historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation,
water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs,
considerations of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local
agencies and officials; Native Hawaiian Organizations; and other interested parties in
order to evaluate the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of this proposed activity.
Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine
whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest
factors listed above.
PUBLIC HEARING: Comments are also used to determine the need for a public
hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Any person
may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public
hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state
clearly and concisely, the reasons and rationale for holding a public hearing. The District
Commander will then decide if a hearing should be held.
COMMENT AND REVIEW PERIOD: Comments on this public notice should be made
in writing via conventional mail or e-mail. Comments will be accepted and made part of
the record and will be considered in determining whether it would be in the public
interest to authorize this proposal. Conventional mail comments should be sent to:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District
Regulatory Office, Attn: Ms. Vera Koskelo
Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5440
Alternatively, comments may be emailed to Vera.B.Koskelo@usace.army.mil.
Reference POH-2015-00221 in the subject heading of the email. In order to be
accepted, e-mail comments must originate from the author’s e-mail account. All e-mail
comments should be sent to Vera.B.Koskelo@usace.army.mil
Both conventional mail and e-mail comments must include the DA permit number POH-2015-00221, and the commentor’s name, address, and phone number. All comments
whether conventional mail or e-mail should be received by the close of business
on June 20, 2018.
PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY: It should be noted that materials submitted as part of
the permit application become part of the public record and are thus available to the
general public under the procedures of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Submissions should not include any information that the submitter seeks to preserve as
If you have any questions about this project or the permit process, please contact Ms. Vera Koskelo via telephone at (808) 835-4310 or via email at Vera.B.Koskelo@usace.army.mil.